Lancing Parish Council Website
Meetings
Dates for council meetings in municipal year 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 please click on
the relevant meeting below for list of dates.
Annual Village Residents Forum will take place on Thursday 27th May
2010
All Meetings commence at 7:30pm (other than the Planning Advisory Committee
which commences at 7:00pm) and are open to members of the public.
LANCING
PARISH COUNCIL
Draft Minutes of the Lancing Parish Residents
meeting held on Thursday, 28th May 2009 at 7.00pm in the
Parish Hall, South Street, Lancing.
Chairman Councillor Ann
Bridges
In
attendance Colin Hunt, Clerk to the Lancing Parish
Council
Councillors Present – Councillors Brenda
Collard, Fred Lewis, Stephen Martin and Ann Terry.
There were 12 members of the public present at the
meeting.
1 The meeting was opened by the Chairman at 7.00pm who welcomed
the members of the public to the meeting.
2. Apologies for absence – Councillor Simon Bridges
2 The Minutes of the previous meeting held on 23rd
October 2008 was confirmed to be an accurate and true record of the
meeting with the exception of one error to a resident’s name.
4. The Chairman read her annual report for 2008/9. Copies were
circulated at the meeting together with the minutes of last years
meeting.
5. Questions and statements by the Public
5.1 Mrs Matten was concerned about the loss of retail outlets in
the Village. Not so long ago the village was vibrant with a large
variety of shops selling an array of goods. Recently however a large
number of takeaways and betting shops had sprung up in their place which
meant that there was less appeal for residents to visit the village
centre for their normal shopping.
The Chair agreed with
the observation and said that this was mainly due to the economic
downturn and that other towns and villages were also suffering. The
recent announcement that ASDA would be opening in the Village was
welcomed and it was hoped that the store would attract visitors from
neighbouring communities.
Mrs Matten asked if
perhaps some free advertising in the village voice or some form of grant
aid for local businesses may be possible.
5.2 Mr Devoy agreed that the area was less attractive and would
like to see bistro type establishments in Lancing. Mr Devoy also spoke
about the lack of facilities for younger people with the consequence of
groups congregating on street corners. In the past youngsters used to
gather at the Mermaid amusement arcade on the sea front but alas his had
now gone.
The Chair informed the
meeting that the Boundstone Youth Centre was opening an additional night
and that the Tabernacle had plans to open a youth facility.
Mr Quallington spoke and
hoped that the Electric Storm enterprise would address some of the youth
issues although the initiative had seemed to have stalled recently. The
Chair advised Mr Quallington that Electric Storm were still active but
at the present time they were busy fund raising.
5.3 One local resident, who didn’t tender her name, was critical
of the local community for not supporting local trade, which she
considered compounded the shop closure situation. She also supported the
idea of free advertising and suggested that invitations be sent to local
traders inviting them to a meeting to better understand their
predicaments.
5.4 Another resident suggested greater use of the other free
publication ‘Living in Lancing’ for advertising local issues and urged
the Council to be more proactive in the business community. Councillor
Brenda Collard informed the meeting that in her capacity as Chair of
Adur District Council she was arranging a lunch for small businesses and
would report back to Council any matters arising.
5.5 Another resident also suggested that local landlords be
approached to see if there was an opportunity for them to reduce rents
for empty shop premises in an attempt to attract new businesses to the
area. He spoke of the disproportionate rents of Lancing commercial
lettings in relation to other areas.
5.6 Mr David Devoy enquired if there was an opportunity for a
Farmers Market to be introduced into Lancing. The Chair informed the
meeting that this idea was being explored with the car park at
Littlecroft being a likely venue.
5.7 Mr Quallington brought up the subject of policing in the
Village. He was concerned about the speed of cars generally and down his
road, Lynchmere Avenue, in particular. The Chair informed the meeting
that there was a police initiative known as ‘Crackdown’ and a web site
where incidents could be reported. If car drivers were repeatedly
reported then the police would visit the offenders and give warnings.
Mr Quallington continued by saying there was still an apparent lack of
beat policing.
Mr Stuart Metcalf, the
PCSO for Manor Ward, responded and informed the meeting that speeding
was indeed an issue in the village and this subject was constantly
raised at the police neighbourhood panel meetings.
Mr Metcalf spoke of a
new device known as SID (speed indicator device) which was to be
deployed on roads in the village and would display motorist’s speed.
This was for use in places where the criteria for deploying speed
cameras was not reached.
He also elaborated on
operation ‘Crackdown’ saying that other motoring offences such use of
mobile phones should also be reported and urged residents to use the
facility. He also urged residents to feed any policing concerns through
to the neighbourhood panels for discussion.
5.8 The Chair asked Mr Metcalf if anything could be done about the
sale of cars on the highway, which was particularly evident on Brighton
Road and the layby on the A27 by the Leisure Centre. Mr Metcalf advised
the meeting that the problem was being dealt with but that the powers
lay with Trading Standards.
On this subject Mr
Matten said that he and neighbours were monitoring the situation on
Brighton Road and gathering evidence which he intend to pass to WSCC for
action.
5.9 Councillor Steve Martin asked Mr Metcalf if there was any news
on the cannabis café situation. Mr Metcalf referred to reports in the
local press and that there appeared to be a planning technicality which
had complicated the process of closeure but an Anti Social Behaviour
Order (ASBO) had been issued for a period of three months pending a
decision on the possible permanent closure of the establishment. Current
reports did however suggest that there had not been any further
activity.
5.10 Mr David Devoy enquired into the latest situation regarding the
Mermaid café development. The Chair advised the meeting that a revised
planning application for two restaurants had recently been granted and
that building works should recommence shortly.
On the same subject one
local resident referred to the iconic building at Littlehampton and the
press coverage this had received and which had aroused interest. This
was now a landmark for the town and he posed the question if a similar
‘statement’ would be worth considering for the village.
The Chair informed the
meeting that alternative ideas had been explored but that the costs
involved were considered to be prohibitive. However, the Council were
expecting that the new kiosk and the introduction of decking would be a
great improvement.
The resident, who was a
keen kite surfer, explained that the area was very popular with surfers,
some of whom travel down from London and that it would be good for the
village to offer decent facilities. The Chair informed the meeting that
the Council were encouraging kite surfing into the area and had
sanctioned the use of areas of the beach for kiting and training and
that the Council recognised the potential for the village and were keen
to promote the sport.
5.11 Mrs Pam Pashley enquired if there was any possibility that the
civic amenity tip, once located at Hailwick Lane could be reinstated.
Residents were apparently told it would open again but that nothing had
happened. The Chair said that the Council would approach WSCC to find
out more about the situation.
5.12 A resident, who lived on Ingleside Crescent complained about
the noise from the rear of the Arts Centre on Penhill Road. She had
reported this to the Environmental Health Department at ADC who had
offered noise monitoring equipment but only for a limited time. The
resident did say that the Arts Centre had been helpful and said that
sound proofing had been installed but that the resident had not markedly
noticed any difference.
The Resident was not
opposed to the facility as she respected the youngsters and that there
had been bands playing for a number of years. However in her opinion the
situation was getting worse and asked if there was anything the Council
could do.
The Chair, who represented the Council on the Boundstone
Youth Centre Management Board did recall a grant being made for
soundproof curtains and a noise limiter and that she would make
enquiries at the next meeting of the Management Board.
5.13 Mrs Matten suggested that a local competition might be arranged
along the lines of the popular TV show ‘Britain’s got talent’. She
suggested that the local schools be invited to take part. This was
considered to be a good idea by the meeting although one resident
suggested that this be put on hold for the time being as the local
schools were heavily engaged in the amalgamation of schools
programme
The Chair thanked Mrs
Matten for the suggestion and hoped that something could be arranged at
an appropriate time. The Chair informed the meeting that she was hopeful
of arranging an arts competition between the local schools later in the
year with the winning entry being chosen for the Council’s Christmas
card.
5.14
Mr David Devoy enquired if Councillor Tony Nicklen was still
active in the workings of the Parish Council. The Chair advised the
meeting that Cllr Nicklen had attended the last Full Council meeting of
the Parish Council and that he was still active at district level.
5.15
Mrs Matten lastly thanked the Council for taking notice of the
resident’s issues and delivering on their promises. She spoke of the
welcomed transformation of the attitude of the Council and apologised
if she had been over zealous in some of her actions but which she
assured the Council was in the best interests of the Community.
Cllr Fred Lewis replied
to Mrs Matten saying that Mrs Matten’s intentions and comments were
always seen a constructive and were welcomed and that any challenge to
the Council was seen to be healthy and kept the council ‘on its toes’.
There being no further
questions the Chairman thanked everyone for attending and closed the
meeting a 20:02.
Colin Hunt
Clerk to the Council
1st June 2009
LANCING
PARISH RESIDENTS MEETING
Minutes of the Lancing Parish Residents meeting
held on Thursday, 23rd October 2008 at 7.00pm in the Parish
Hall, South Street, Lancing.
Chairman Councillor Ann
Bridges
In
attendance Colin Hunt, Clerk to the Lancing Parish
Council
There were about 150 members of the public present
at the meeting including a representative from the local Press.
1 The meeting was opened by the Chairman at 7.00pm who welcomed
the members of the public to the meeting.
2 The Minutes of the previous meeting held on 29th
May 2008 was confirmed to be an accurate and true record of the meeting
by all those residents who attended.
3 The Chairman gave an explanation of the purpose of the
meeting which was to discuss two possible options for the restoration of
Beach Green:-
§
Option A was to excavate the blocks, break up on site and
remove the debris from Beach Green and re-instate the area and:-
§
Option B was to import soil, regrade the areas where the
blocks are showing and either seed or turf the surface.
4 The Chairman invited Mrs Matten of 237 Brighton
Road to give a short photographic historical account of the placement of
the concrete blocks beneath Beach Green.
Mrs Matten produced
some information and photographs which gave the audience some useful
background information.
5 The Chairman thanked Mrs Matten and invited members of the
public to speak on behalf of both options. In order to avoid the meeting
over running, it was requested that speeches should be limited to no
more than 5 minute per speaker.
5.1 Mrs Odom enquired whose idea was it to dig up one of the
blocks in the first place. The Chairman advised residents that the
reason for removing just one of the blocks was to let residents see
exactly how large the blocks were.
5.2 Mr Tony Williamson representing the Lancing and Sompting Lions
Club, who used Beach Green for major events, did not have any problems
with the existing surface and suggested that there was another option
which was to do nothing.
The Chairman advised residents that the issue was one of
public liability insurance due to the health and safety issue and that
some form of action was required.
5.3 Mrs Angie Mills, the ex-Chairman of Lancing Parish Council
spoke for option A and advised residents against increasing the surface
level of Beach Green which could cause flooding of the A257.
Mrs Mills also advised
the meeting that the paragraph concerning a recommendation to infill was
not part of the final report presented by Stratascan.
She also assured the
residents that she had done everything possible in her role of Chairman
of Lancing Parish Council to help resolve the issue and that in her
opinion option B was not a permanent solution.
5.4 David Davies enquired if the options had been costed and
whether Beach Green would be maintained to avoid a similar recurrence in
future.
The Chairman advised the meeting of a figure quoted for
option A was £15k, although this was sometime ago and that due to the
downturn in demand for the crushed materials this figure could well
increase. The latest costing for option B was estimated at no more than
£50k but that competitive tenders will be sought whatever option was
preferred.
The Chairman also advised residents that the Council would
maintain the Green in future.
5.5 Mrs Theresa Dicker, an ex councillor who had lived opposite
the Green for 28 years, stated that the Green was a great source of
income to the Parish and that it had not been maintained in all the time
she had lived opposite. She spoke for option B and also urged the
Council to maintain the Green in future.
5.6 Mrs Matten spoke of an original quotation from a local
contractor which was reported to be £500k, which then changed to zero
cost and then changed again to a charge of £15k.
Mrs Matten suggested
that considering the number of blocks beneath the Green the sale of the
concrete could realise a value of £1M.
5.7 Mr Tony Carpmael, who advised the meeting that he was an
original founding member of the Beach Green Action Group, also spoke of
several prices that had been quoted to him. He was also alarmed at the
cost of excavating just one of the blocks which had taken one day and
costed £1680.
5.8 Mr Gary Pannell questioned the ex-chairman’s claim of the risk
of flooding to the A357 if the surface of the Green was raised. Mr
Pannell suggested that only an average of 264mm of cover would be
required to counteract the effects of the soil erosion that had taken
place and that this additional depth would not cause flooding.
5.9 Mr Quallington supported Mr Pannell’s argument and stated that
he had taken water borehole measurements which suggested that the rise
in water table varied by no more than 200mm even when accounting for the
pressure of the tide and water levels from the Downs.
5.10 Mr White enquired if there was enough reserves to pay for any
works or whether there would need to be an increase in rates to cover
the costs over a number of years.
The Chairman advised the meeting that there were financial
reserves available which should be sufficient to cover the expected
costs and that depending upon those cost the works may be able to be
undertaken in one year. This will however be dependent upon the extent
of the works of the preferred option and competitive tenders received.
5.11
At this point Mrs Matten called a motion for the meeting to be
concluded and a vote to be taken on the options. As the majority of
residents at the meeting agreed with the motion a show of hands was
proposed.
6 The Chairman reminded the meeting of the other votes that had
been received and suggested a ballot box vote. This was accepted and
those residents that were eligible to vote made their choice.
Once all residents had
had the opportunity to cast their votes the ballot was declared closed
and the box was opened. The votes were counted by the Chairman in the
presence of the Clerk and several residents.
7 The number of votes on the night was:-
For
Option A = 6 For Option B = 122
The number of Postal and
email received:-
For
Option A = 5 For Option B = 391
TOTAL VOTES CAST
The total number of
votes received from all sources recorded was:-
For Option A = 11 For Option B = 513
8 The Chairman thanked everyone for
attending and closed the meeting a 19:45.
Colin Hunt
Clerk to the Council
31-10-2008
*****************************************************************
DRAFT &
UNCONFIRMED
LANCING
PARISH COUNCIL
Minutes of the Lancing Parish
people held on Thursday, 29th May 2008 at 7.30pm,
Chairman Councillor Tony
Nicklen
Clerks Colin Hunt, Clerk to the Lancing Parish
Council and John Roberts Acting Clerk to the Lancing Parish Council.
Councillors Present – Councillors Andrew Barns, Melvyn Blackband, Ann
Bridges, Simon Bridges, Richard Burt, Brenda Collard, Mary Hamblin,
Stephen Martin, Morgan Nahid, Ann Terry and Norman Wright.
There were about 60 members of the public present.
1. The meeting was opened by the Chairman
at 7.30 with an explanation of the purpose of the meeting and the
reasons for the change of date.
2. Apologies for absence – Councillors Lorna Reed, Pat
Beresford, Fred Lewis and Kim Bonnett.
3. The Chairman read the retiring Chairman’s annual report for
2007/8. Copies were circulated at the meeting together with minutes of
last years meeting.
4. Questions and statements by the Public
(a)
Mr
Joyner 103 Penhill Road stated that there was no mention of the blocks
on last years meeting
The Chairman explained
that this was a different meeting and the issue of the blocks were
discussed at Council meetings.
(b) Mrs Matten, 237
Brighton Road enquired when the outstanding questions she had raised in
various correspondence and meetings would be dealt with.
The Chairman referred to
the recent vacant clerks post and explained that answers would be
forthcoming where possible in due course.
(c) Mrs Quick, 67 Cecil
Road enquired why only 15minutes were allotted for members of the public
to raise questions at Council meetings.
The Chairman explained
that this was a standard time to invite questions. To allow more time
could lead to meetings becoming lengthy and might fail to discuss issues
before the Council
Mr Hutton, 22 Marlin
Court, stated that when elected Councillors undertook to work on the
peoples behalf and should listen to the people.
Mrs Matten reminded the
Council of the code of conduct.
The Chairman stated
that the Council collectively will decide the issues to be discussed and
this was not a personal decision. If elected Members wish to discus
certain issues they would be given the opportunity.
(d) Mrs Matten, 237
Brighton Road informed the meeting that she was under the impression
that only residents of Lancing were eligible to attend the meeting.
The Acting Clerk advised
the meeting that those not living in the Parish could add to the debate
but could not vote in any poll.
(e) Mr Booker,
complained about the emergency gas works on the A259. He suggested that
70% of time there was no work and no control and although the road works
were completed on Friday at 12 noon the road was not open until 6 hours
later. He asked that WSCC be contacted for an explanation.
(f) Mr Eden 17 The
Tynings, asked how much under-spend does the Council expect this year as
there was a £35k under-spend last year and why has the precept risen to
7.5 %. Mr Eden enquired the reason for the traffic wardens (£500) and
the testing of electrical equipment (£2400)
The Chairman stated that
traffic control was provided by PCSO’s on Bank Holiday Mondays but that
the police had not always charged the Parish for the service. The
testing of electrical equipment was a statutory duty for all Councils.
Mr Eden enquired why the
Parish had such a large reserve fund.
The Chairman explained
that the reserve was to cater for emergencies or any contingencies that
may happen during the year.
(g) Mrs Quick asked if
new Councillors could make themselves k
known
All Councillors present
stood and introduced themselves
(h) Mr Graham Brown, 147
Brighton Road enquired what scrutiny does this Council play in other
council finances
The Chairman responded
by assuring the meeting that as a number of Parish Councillors were
District Councillors also there was always a concern about all levels of
government expenditure. The Chairman pointed out the recent merger
between Adur and Worthing and the savings of £500k and that all were
looking for savings continually.
(j) Mr Eggington brought
up the question that there may be evidence of asbestos in the blocks at
Beach Green and that if so the blocks would be better left in place and
covered.
Mrs Matten enquired why
if asbestos was put in concrete why has one been uncovered and left on
public view. A member of the public who had worked for many years in the
construction industry said that there may be some confusion as only
fly-ash from power stations was used which helped with the viscosity of
the mixture.
Mr Eggington qualified
his statement and referred to asbestos being present as infill material
and if this was the case then the area should be left undisturbed.
The Chairman stated that
the blocks had been tested for detrimental material and stated that the
issue would be investigated.
Mrs Matten suggested
that too much money had already been spent on this issue and that
further testing and the idea of a Parish pole was a further waste of
money
Mrs. Quick referred to
the Conservative election leaflet mandate to hold a referendum if
elected. Mrs Quick was of the opinion that that the previous contractor
who had undertaken remedial works on the Green had not done a good job
and that the professional survey had suppressed the true conclusions.
Mrs Quick then called for a vote at the meeting to gauge public opinion
on the Beach Green issue.
Mr. Eden seconded this
motion.
Cllr Hamblin asked that
if only a covering of soil was placed over the area could there be
similar problems in the future. The Chairman confirmed that that could
possibly be the case.
Mrs Matten suggested
that if the Council had maintained the area better over the last 20/30
years then this would not have been a problem and that the Council will
hopefully learn from the mistakes and put a sufficient maintenance
budget in place in future.
The Chairman reassured
Mrs Matten that the area has always been inspected regularly.
Mr. Matten suggested
that we ensure that the movements of the market lorries are regulated to
minimise any future damage to the surface.
At this point the
Chairman put the motion to the vote. There was only one vote not in
favour of the motion.
Mrs Matten sought
assurance that the members of the Council who had voted for the motion
would not vote otherwise at a future Council meeting.
(k) Mrs Pashley
commented that the gardens in village look well and suggested that if
there was any spare money perhaps consideration could be given to
refurbishing Monks Recreation Ground changing rooms.
(l) Mrs Pashley also
raised the question of dog wardens on the beach as not all dog owners
clear up after their dog. Cllr Bridges explained that the Adur DC is
looking into this matter and hopefully this will appear on a future
Council agenda.
(m) Mr Hutton was
concerned about building in green spaces, and in particular Beach Green,
and asked if the Council would consider registering the open spaces and
green areas to prevent this from happening.
The Chairman explained
that Beach Green is already protected and only certain structures such
as a shelter and band stand are permitted. The chairman also said that
other sites would be considered.
(n) Mrs Matten raised
three matters:-
(1)
That
the Village Regeneration Scheme had not been progressed and asked that a
Councillor champion the project
(2)
Could
the Parish Council encourage the formation of Youth Council, perhaps
with the local PCSO’s and
(3)
Could
a ‘Gorgeous garden’ competition be organised.
Cllr Bridges informed
the meeting that ADC run such a youth Council and that she would support
the ‘Gorgeous garden’ initiative.
Cllr Collard informed
the meeting that ADC do run a garden competition and that Lancing only
submitted five applications last year.
Mrs Matten suggested
that perhaps the local schools could help with advertising the event and
design posters etc.
(o) Mr Collington
suggested that the Councillors should hire a coach and tour the area to
see some of the problems and referred to flooding at Manor Parade and
the Cemetery which in his opinion needed some form of over pumping and
suggested that this issue be taken up by the Parish Council.
Cllr Bridges enquired if
Mr Collington had taken this issue up with ADC and he confirmed that he
had.
Clrr Terry said she was
in the process of walking around the area to gain an understanding of
the issues.
(p) Mrs Matten enquired
if training would be available for Councillors
The Chairman and Cllr
Terry confirmed that Councillor training was underway and that there
would be more to follow.
(q) Mr Eden was
concerned about the cycle lanes along the foreshore. Mrs Matten agreed
and said that there had been several near accidents. Mr Eden asked the
Chairman for his thoughts.
The Chairman informed
that WSCC were responsible for the lanes and expressed a personal
opinion that certain liberties appeared to have been taken by the County
Council which will be taken up with them.
(r) Mr Matten raised the
question of an apparent encroachment onto Parish land by the developers
of the building on Beach Green and asked the chairman if this matter
could be investigated.
The Chairman confirmed
that this would be done.
(s) Mrs Quick asked what
happens now concerning the discussion over Beach Green.
The Chairman advised the
meeting that the Council will seek advice on the issue of asbestos and
discuss the issue again at a future Council meeting.
(t) Mr Gordon Brown
raised a question concerning the public question time at Council
meetings. He asked if questions could be raised during and after Council
meetings. Mrs Matten informed the meeting that there was one council
which do allow public questions throughout the proceedings.
It was agreed that this
matter would be discussed at a future council meeting.
(u) Mrs Matten raised
the matter of Council ground staff using strimmers in preference to the
recently acquired grass mowers.
The Chairman asked the
Clerk to look into this matter and report his findings.
There being no further
questions the Chairman thanked everyone for attending and closed the
meeting a 21:05.
|